Head-to-Head Comparison: 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs. 2016 Mazda CX-5

If you’re shopping for a crossover SUV, you have more options than ever, as automakers have recently developed several all-new models to meet consumer demand. Many of these new crossovers, like the 2016 Mazda CX-3, are subcompact SUVs that offer the flexible cargo space and high seating position of larger SUVs, but with a slightly smaller size, lower cost up front and better fuel economy. One sacrifice with subcompact SUVs is space, and that’s where compact SUVs like the 2016 Mazda CX-5 come into play. Size, however, isn’t the only factor that differentiates Mazda’s small crossovers, so read on to find out whether the CX-3 or CX-5 is right for you.

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-3 »

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-5 »

See our Affordable Compact SUV rankings »

See our Affordable Subcompact SUV rankings »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-3 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-3 Photos
• See Subcompact SUVs Rankings

Pricing

In general, the CX-3 will cost you about $3,000 less than a similarly-equipped CX-5. The CX-3 starts at $19,960 and comes standard with an automatic transmission, while the CX-5 comes standard with a manual transmission and starts at $21,795. A CX-5 with an automatic starts at $23,195. All-wheel drive is available with both the CX-3 and CX-5 for an additional $1,250.

See 2016 Mazda CX-3 Specs »

See 2016 Mazda CX-5 Specs »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

Engine and Fuel Economy

Both the CX-3 (146 horsepower) and CX-5 (155 horsepower) come standard with a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine. A 184-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is available with the CX-5 but not the CX-3. With the 2.0-liter engine and an automatic transmission, the CX-5 returns an EPA-estimated 26/33 mpg city/highway. The CX-3, meanwhile, returns an EPA-estimated 29/35 mpg city/highway.

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-3 »

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-5 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-5 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-5 Photos
• See Compact SUVs Rankings

Performance

Test drivers say the 2.0-liter engine in both the CX-3 and CX-5 produces adequate power for around town driving, but most wish it had a little more punch for passing and merging on the highway. The CX-5’s optional 184-horsepower, 2.5-liter engine is more up to the task, auto writers report. On winding roads, the CX-3 and CX-5 both boast especially athletic handling and sharp steering, critics say, and some add that Mazda's small crossovers are near the top of their respective classes in terms of driving fun.

Read more on the 2016 Mazda CX-3’s performance »

Read more on the 2016 Mazda CX-5’s performance »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-5 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-5 Photos
• See Compact SUVs Rankings

Interior Features and Technology

Both the CX-3 and CX-5 come standard with Bluetooth, a USB port and push-button start, while the CX-3 adds an infotainment system, a 7-inch touch screen and a rearview camera (all available with the CX-5). A Bose audio system, satellite radio, navigation, adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert and forward collision warning with automatic braking are available with both vehicles. Test drivers report that the infotainment setup in each model is generally easy to operate.

See a list of 2016 Mazda CX-3 Features »

See a list of 2016 Mazda CX-5 Features »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-5 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-5 Photos
• See Compact SUVs Rankings

Seating Space and Comfort

The 2016 Mazda CX-3 and CX-5 have seating for five people in two rows. Up front, both crossovers offer good comfort and support, test drivers say. Keep in mind that the CX-3 doesn’t offer a power-adjustable driver’s seat like the CX-5 does. In back, critics agree the CX-5 has enough space for adults to get comfortable, while most auto writers say the CX-3’s rear seats are cramped, offering very limited head- and legroom for adults.

Read more on 2016 Mazda CX-3’s Interior »

Read more on 2016 Mazda CX-5’s Interior »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-5 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-5 Photos
• See Compact SUVs Rankings

Cargo Space

With both rows of seats in use, the CX-3 offers 12.4 cubic feet of cargo space. If the rear seat is folded down, storage space increases to 44.5 cubic feet, which is low for a subcompact SUV. Additionally, auto writers report the CX-3’s high load height and lack of a flat cargo floor can make loading larger items difficult. In contrast, the CX-5 has fold-flat rear seats and more generous space that measures 34.1 cubic feet with both rows in use and 64.8 cubic feet with the rear row folded down.

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-3 »

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-5 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-3 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-3 Photos
• See Subcompact SUVs Rankings

Mazda CX-3 or Mazda CX-5?

Due to very positive reviews from the automotive press, both the CX-3 and CX-5 rank highly among affordable crossover SUVs. Which one is better for you ultimately depends on your priorities. If you value cargo space or need adult-friendly second-row seating, you’ll be better off with a CX-5. If you can get by without that extra space, the CX-3’s higher fuel economy, lower price tag and generous standard features make it a very compelling option.

See our Affordable Compact SUV rankings »

See our Affordable Subcompact SUV rankings »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-5 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-5 Photos
• See Compact SUVs Rankings

Buy or Lease a CX-3 or CX-5

Mazda is offering competitive lease and finance incentives on the CX-3 and CX-5 this month. You can lease a 2016 CX-3 for $289 per month for 39 months with $0 due at signing and no first month’s payment. Or, the 2016 CX-5 can be yours for only $269 per month for 39 months with $0 due at signing and no first month’s payment. You could also purchase a CX-5 this month with zero percent financing for a limited term.

See the best Mazda deals and incentives this month »

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-3 »

See our review of the 2016 Mazda CX-5 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-3 »

See U.S. News Best Prices on the 2016 CX-5 »

• Read the 2016 Mazda CX-3 Full Review
• See 2016 Mazda CX-3 Photos
• See Subcompact SUVs Rankings